Skip to main content

If It Looks Too Good to Be True, Guess What?

What is it in some that decides the rules when it comes to presenting oneself as a savior of the investor? First of all show me an advisor that isn't an investor and I’ll show you a poor advisor, or for that matter a source of poor advice. The lies that are perpetuated in the name of sound thinking are beyond the pale of sociopathic babble. With all the guidance offered by technology each of us is empowered to a level that poses as academic while it skirts the edge of celebrity.
So what do we think compels the outcome, conflict of interest? Just as it inhabits the thin soul of the casual advisor conflict of interest can manifest itself in experienced advisors as well. And that’s where I draw the line. The countless blogs that fill the internet offering advice in the name of nothing more than experience at noting more than giving advice (Whew!) I’m not just talking about classic conflicts of interest exclusively, I’m throwing in the oversight failures of the entire regulatory industry that has allowed the mutual fund companies to charge obscured fees, present unrealistic results for comparisons that are only available to the largest investors and generally provide marketing support to advisors while throwing them to the wolves in exchange for leniency from the financial reformists.
In short people are seeking out advice with more deliberate intent than at any other time in my career. But should that advice come at a price and is that price a conflict of interest if it is in the best interests of the consumer. It all depends on the responsibility of the buy and sell side institutions. Is the fee only advisor the best solution? Not if the one/two punch of overwhelming evidence (empirical and mathematical) is that the long term outcome is skewed negatively. Is the independent advisor the best solution. Not if one forgets that the independent advisor has moved in such a direction because of the potential for higher payouts. And while I’m on the subject of payouts can someone tell me the difference between a fee and a commission. If you pay a bill over time isn’t it often MORE EXPENSIVE than if you pay it at the beginning. Anyone who own life insurance will tell you the annual program is better than the monthly program. There is only one entity that the monthly program works best for and that’s the institutions. I’m ranting about the consumer!
Past performance is not indicative of future performance (I didn’t make it up) Isn’t it worth noting therefore that while talent is only recognized in an individual if that individual has accomplished something out of the ordinary first. The financial industry says that talent is assumed by external achievements such as lofty academic credentials. Many of the largest finance companies have profited, and recently stumbled, from the efforts of this lively and intelligent group. A simple rule for success 101, cost should never be a hired at the expense of talent and talent should never be bought at the expense of experience.

Popular posts from this blog

I B!#*$ For A Living

Not really, but I’d like to. The problem is I don’t search, or that is to say I don’t search for this blog. I do search, regularly so, with the same vigor that I flip though a newspaper. I have my pet subjects, finance, art, and sports, politics (not necessarily in that order) I never look at real estate and I rarely look at style articles. One of the reasons I don’t search for this blog is because there is a fine relationship between the price (the value of an asset) and time (the freshness of the analysis) that serve to form my views. That’s the only way I can assure that my posts are mine, grammatical blemishes and all. It also affords me the privilege of some license whereby I’m open to write about almost anything that strikes me as useful in the aim to inform. That’s one of the main reasons I choose to inhabit the space, which brings light to financial news, because it’s so reliant on nearly every other market, across all cultural and political spectrums and best of all it always…

Please Don't Believe Everything You Read

“I have news for you” said Andre
And as I peered through his bad hair weave, and “coke bottle”” glasses I realized he was right.

Nowhere in our collective memories do we ever fully understand the workings of our mind. Driven not by the collective accumulation of information but rather defined by the processes eternally influenced by the random cocktail of chemicals in our heads and poisoned by the principles we carry around in our back pockets with all smug confidence.