Skip to main content

I Think It's Time I get A Hobby

The amount of politics that swirls around the markets theses days is actually trumping the markets themselves. I wake up in the morning and check out some headlines on my CFA feed and when I’ve had a cup of coffee I turn on CNBC and ready myself for the onslaught of self-aggrandizing ranting and opinionating. Now I’m a blogger so I have an excuse since, at least until I reach 15K viewers a day, I’m still not in the league that might require me to measure my tone on behalf of a wider audience. Not because I’m a sell out (although for the right price I could be) It’s because I believe that even if what I have say is shocking, or funny or dead serious, as long as it’s not boring (rambling is my weakness) it might be interesting to someone else, although I never take that for granted.

For example, I don’t see where the stock market, by which I’m referring to the broad indexes including the Nadaq and the Dow Jones Industrial Average, has any chance of regaining the spotlight it has held for the past 20 years. In fact I don’t clearly understand how so many people got caught up in the notion that the stock market was a proxy for economic growth. I would suggest that there are only 2 times in history where the stock markets raged in spite of wavering economic signals, in the 1920’s and in the 1990’s, and in both instances it ended badly for investors. While the decline in valuations that occurred in the early part of the century, it was tech specifically which took some of the heat for its former excesses it also took some of the attention away from an economy that was not keeping up with P/E estimates in general. The result is where we find ourselves now, 50% poorer than we were last year.

Now I’m not saying a rally can’t ensue in anticipation of some growth, especially where by any sequential measure it’s experiencing recession. But those rallies are a far cry from the kinds of rallies that were being hailed by the advisor community in favor of more and more unyielding investment choices. In my judgment we are entering a period of return that will be driven by stock selection and not in behaviorally unbalanced index investing.

So, on that note I ask the following, what would take for me to bring more readers into my internet space? While I’d love to think that my witty unraveling of confusing subjects might be a start, but I’d be getting ahead of myself. My goal is twofold, bring the facts as I see them and refer to those facts in my spiral research. If I present it in a manner that offers some content with fresh perspective, than I’ve succeeded. It’s not always easy to be fresh however the upside to my attempts is that I provide a forum that encourages people looking for a second opinion to seek it out. After all you wouldn’t take the word of a doctor without a second opinion why wouldn’t you extend the same logic to your advisor.

Popular posts from this blog

I B!#*$ For A Living

Not really, but I’d like to. The problem is I don’t search, or that is to say I don’t search for this blog. I do search, regularly so, with the same vigor that I flip though a newspaper. I have my pet subjects, finance, art, and sports, politics (not necessarily in that order) I never look at real estate and I rarely look at style articles. One of the reasons I don’t search for this blog is because there is a fine relationship between the price (the value of an asset) and time (the freshness of the analysis) that serve to form my views. That’s the only way I can assure that my posts are mine, grammatical blemishes and all. It also affords me the privilege of some license whereby I’m open to write about almost anything that strikes me as useful in the aim to inform. That’s one of the main reasons I choose to inhabit the space, which brings light to financial news, because it’s so reliant on nearly every other market, across all cultural and political spectrums and best of all it always…

Please Don't Believe Everything You Read

“I have news for you” said Andre
And as I peered through his bad hair weave, and “coke bottle”” glasses I realized he was right.

Nowhere in our collective memories do we ever fully understand the workings of our mind. Driven not by the collective accumulation of information but rather defined by the processes eternally influenced by the random cocktail of chemicals in our heads and poisoned by the principles we carry around in our back pockets with all smug confidence.