Skip to main content

OFTEN WRONG, BUT NEVER IN DOUBT

There is very little we can do to affect the broad markets since most of what does influence emanates from emotion. But just in case we loose sight of the very reason we invest in the first place we should remember that the essence of long term discipline is that short term effect is more distraction than substance. That distraction however is especially potent these days as more and more investors are compelled to do it themselves, egged on by the thrill of young studs harnessing technology for answers to the questions that have eluded us for centuries, namely when to get into the market and when to get out. Allow me my own perspective…TIMING DOESN'T WORK.

Whew, that was harder than it sounded. As you know I am not adverse to the benefits of sound analysis of the indexes including methods that rely on technical analysis. But technical analysis is only a means by which a set of ranges are established by a methodology arrived at statistically from a consistent base sequence independently correlated to index prices. Arriving at a set of levels, for example, where to buy and where not to buy (as opposed to sell) is the easy part. The hard part is accepting that since price action is mostly determined by emotion the outcome of a set of price points will invariably be skewed. Luckily though there are many events that do repeat themselves as when the markets move in reaction to a set of common events, such as the external forces of politics, or the commonly accepted thresholds of certain closely watched economic indicators. While no single event will ever tell me that the stochastic that crosses K through D (look it up) at 20% wont be a more rewarding buy until it goes to 10% an experienced trader will have numerous opportunities to witness the behavior of a buy signal under similar conditions. Therefore while all this information can be plugged into an excel spreadsheet and managed to a set of predetermined translations of events, back tested through randomization (I know because I've done it) it still will fall short of human interpretation. And since those price points I mentioned earlier are skewed so would their interpretation.

I don’t mean to be confusing, it’s simply a fact that even the best technical analysis will be wrong, hopefully only 49% of the time. The problem is that fact is never part of the pitch that claims to hold the keys to the kingdom. While the results are often wrong, the claims are never in doubt.

Popular posts from this blog

I B!#*$ For A Living

Not really, but I’d like to. The problem is I don’t search, or that is to say I don’t search for this blog. I do search, regularly so, with the same vigor that I flip though a newspaper. I have my pet subjects, finance, art, and sports, politics (not necessarily in that order) I never look at real estate and I rarely look at style articles. One of the reasons I don’t search for this blog is because there is a fine relationship between the price (the value of an asset) and time (the freshness of the analysis) that serve to form my views. That’s the only way I can assure that my posts are mine, grammatical blemishes and all. It also affords me the privilege of some license whereby I’m open to write about almost anything that strikes me as useful in the aim to inform. That’s one of the main reasons I choose to inhabit the space, which brings light to financial news, because it’s so reliant on nearly every other market, across all cultural and political spectrums and best of all it always…

Please Don't Believe Everything You Read

“I have news for you” said Andre
And as I peered through his bad hair weave, and “coke bottle”” glasses I realized he was right.

Nowhere in our collective memories do we ever fully understand the workings of our mind. Driven not by the collective accumulation of information but rather defined by the processes eternally influenced by the random cocktail of chemicals in our heads and poisoned by the principles we carry around in our back pockets with all smug confidence.