Skip to main content


Much is written these days that maligns the shareholder in favor of the less conflicted private company owners, otherwise known as partners. Well to cut to the chase, I think it’s a lot of baloney for the simple reason that self regulation, the ultimate bane of wall street, doesn’t work no matter how noble the endeavor.
Companies that tout the superiority of partnerships over shareholders often praise their civic duty. While many can bolster that claim with non-profit status, there is no evidence that suggest private companies provide more (as in count ‘em) results form direct community involvement than their public counterparts.
Public companies often get accused of pandering to public emotions when in fact the effort to be more civic minded is driven by the lure of tax advantages. Whether or not it is accurate in specific circumstances is that individuals are being monetarily rewarded for their ingenuity at the expense of those not. The end result in the minds of some is that such a reason eclipses the value of the civic effort at hand. My attitude is who cares? The number of companies who build schools, parks, zoos, museums, all over the world should be judged by their results and punishing them for the disproportionate rewarding of upper management should be a separate debate. To ignore that civic responsibility would be one of the first unintended consequences of shareholder prejudice.
Now is anybody not aware that non-profit organizations, particular those most well known, pay their executives corporate sized salaries. Mind you it’s done more or less according tot the same models used by public corporations. It’s also defended the same way, often insisting that high salaries insure the loyal retention of the best and the brightest of available workers. Partners as a means of ensuring a higher degree of social democracy, referred occasionally as employee owned, are not all created equal. Private companies have the same shareholder hierarchies that public companies do, whether they do business on the retail or multi-national platform a non profit institution, the successful ones anyway make enormous profits, they simply give them to the interests that they serve. The employees of those institutions often give shielded perhaps by their company’s philanthropic umbrella. Those interests at the pubic corporations are the employees, who are often accosted along with their companies and through guilt are giving money to an effort which noble, is often one they can’t afford.

Popular posts from this blog

I B!#*$ For A Living

Not really, but I’d like to. The problem is I don’t search, or that is to say I don’t search for this blog. I do search, regularly so, with the same vigor that I flip though a newspaper. I have my pet subjects, finance, art, and sports, politics (not necessarily in that order) I never look at real estate and I rarely look at style articles. One of the reasons I don’t search for this blog is because there is a fine relationship between the price (the value of an asset) and time (the freshness of the analysis) that serve to form my views. That’s the only way I can assure that my posts are mine, grammatical blemishes and all. It also affords me the privilege of some license whereby I’m open to write about almost anything that strikes me as useful in the aim to inform. That’s one of the main reasons I choose to inhabit the space, which brings light to financial news, because it’s so reliant on nearly every other market, across all cultural and political spectrums and best of all it always…

Please Don't Believe Everything You Read

“I have news for you” said Andre
And as I peered through his bad hair weave, and “coke bottle”” glasses I realized he was right.

Nowhere in our collective memories do we ever fully understand the workings of our mind. Driven not by the collective accumulation of information but rather defined by the processes eternally influenced by the random cocktail of chemicals in our heads and poisoned by the principles we carry around in our back pockets with all smug confidence.